Understanding the basic principles on penalties is essential for students preparing for the Criminologist Licensure Examination (CLE). These principles explain why criminal penalties must have a legal basis, when favorable penal laws may apply retroactively, and how a pardon by the offended party affects criminal proceedings.
This CLE reviewer discusses a multiple-choice question on basic principles in relation to penalties, with emphasis on Articles 21, 22, and 23 of the Revised Penal Code and the specific marriage-related provision in Article 344.
Table of Contents
- CLE Practice Question
- Correct Answer and Important Qualification
- Article 21: Legality of Penalties
- Article 22: Favorable Retroactivity
- Article 23: Pardon by the Offended Party
- Article 344: Marriage-Related Rule
- CLE Board Exam Tips
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Prepare for Your CLE with SLRC
1. CLE Practice Question
Subject: Criminal Law Jurisprudence
Question Number: 17 of 100
Question: The following are some basic principles in relation to penalties, EXCEPT.
- Marriage of one of the accused with the offended party extinguishes the criminal action or remits the penalty already imposed to all accused.
- No felony shall be punishable by any penalty not prescribed prior to its commission.
- Pardon does not extinguish criminal action except as provided in Article 344 of this Code.
- Penal laws shall have no retroactive effect except if it is in favor of the accused and he is not a habitual criminal.
2. Correct Answer and Important Qualification
Most defensible intended answer: A.
Choice A is worded too broadly. Marriage between an offender and the offended party does not automatically extinguish criminal liability in every type of crime or in every situation involving multiple accused. The applicable statute, the offense involved, and the legal conditions must be examined.
However, the qualification is important: Article 344 of the Revised Penal Code expressly extends its marriage-related rule to specified coprincipals, accomplices, and accessories after the fact for the offenses covered by that provision. Therefore, the statement should not be interpreted as universally false in every possible application.
Choices B, C, and D substantially reflect Articles 21, 23, and 22, respectively. The question is best treated as having an intended answer of A, but its wording should be improved to avoid ambiguity.
3. Article 21: Legality of Penalties
Article 21 of the Revised Penal Code establishes the principle that a felony cannot be punished by a penalty that was not prescribed by law before the felony was committed.
This is an expression of the principle of legality in criminal law. The government must have a legal basis for the penalty imposed on an offender. A court cannot simply invent a new criminal penalty and apply it to conduct committed before that penalty was established by law.
Example
Suppose a person commits an offense on a particular date. A penalty is introduced by a later law. As a general rule, the offender cannot be punished under that later, newly created penalty for the earlier act when the penalty was not prescribed before the offense was committed.
The precise application depends on the governing law and any applicable constitutional or statutory rules.
Board exam takeaway: Article 21 concerns the legality and prior prescription of penalties.
4. Article 22: Favorable Retroactivity of Penal Laws
Article 22 provides for the retroactive effect of penal laws insofar as they favor the person guilty of a felony who is not a habitual criminal as defined under the Revised Penal Code. The provision also contemplates situations in which a final sentence has already been pronounced and the convict is serving it.
This principle is commonly called favorable retroactivity. It is an important exception to the general rule against retroactive application of penal laws when retroactivity would be disadvantageous to an accused.
Example
Imagine that a new penal law reduces the penalty applicable to a particular offense. If the law is favorable to the accused and the statutory conditions are satisfied, Article 22 may allow the favorable rule to apply even to an earlier offense.
The application is not automatic in every case. The actual amendment, the person's circumstances, and the applicable legal requirements must be evaluated.
Board exam takeaway: Article 22 deals with the retroactive application of favorable penal laws, subject to the Code's conditions.
5. Article 23: Effect of Pardon by the Offended Party
Article 23 states that a pardon by the offended party does not extinguish the criminal action except as provided in Article 344. It also addresses civil liability concerning the injured party's interest, which may be extinguished by an express waiver as specified in the provision.
The important distinction is between a private offended party's pardon and an absolute pardon granted by the appropriate government authority. These are different legal concepts and should not be treated as interchangeable.
Why this matters
Criminal offenses may involve interests beyond the private wishes of the offended party. Consequently, a private person's forgiveness does not ordinarily give that person unrestricted power to terminate a criminal prosecution.
Specific statutory exceptions must still be considered, including the relevant rules in Article 344.
Board exam takeaway: A pardon by the offended party generally does not extinguish criminal action, subject to the exceptions established by law.
6. Article 344: Marriage-Related Rule
Article 344 contains special rules concerning the prosecution of specified offenses. Its marriage-related provision must be read according to the offenses and circumstances covered by the applicable law.
The historical text of Article 344 provides that marriage between the offender and the offended party extinguishes the criminal action or remits the penalty already imposed in specified cases. It also extends the stated rule to coprincipals, accomplices, and accessories after the fact for the offenses covered by the provision.
For accurate legal analysis, readers must also consider subsequent legislation that amended the Revised Penal Code, including Republic Act No. 8353, the Anti-Rape Law of 1997, and other applicable amendments. The original wording of an older textbook or review question should not automatically be assumed to state the complete current law.
Consequently, it is inaccurate to conclude either that marriage always extinguishes the criminal liability of every accused or that it can never affect the liability of participants other than the person who married the offended party. The applicable offense and governing statutory provision determine the result.
For the original multiple-choice question, this qualification explains why choice A is the most likely intended answer while also showing why the question would benefit from more precise wording.
Primary legal references:
- Act No. 3815 — Revised Penal Code, Senate Legislative Reference Bureau
- Act No. 3815 — Supreme Court E-Library
These references provide the text of the Revised Penal Code. For a particular case, verify the applicable amendments and current authoritative legal interpretation before relying on an older statutory passage.
7. CLE Board Exam Tips
Remember the key articles
- Article 21: Penalties must be prescribed by law before the commission of the felony.
- Article 22: Penal laws may operate retroactively when favorable to the accused, subject to the statutory conditions.
- Article 23: Pardon by the offended party generally does not extinguish criminal action, subject to legal exceptions.
- Article 344: Contains specific rules on the prosecution of certain offenses, including the marriage-related rule in its applicable scope.
Watch for absolute statements
Words such as “always,” “all,” “never,” and “automatically” can make a statement inaccurate when the actual legal rule is limited by particular offenses, statutory conditions, or exceptions.
However, do not reject an answer choice simply because it contains a broad word. Check whether the governing statute expressly supports the stated scope. Article 344 is an example of why the precise wording matters.
Use the EXCEPT technique
- Identify the negative instruction: the question asks for the exception.
- Recall the governing legal article for each statement.
- Compare each choice with the actual legal rule.
- Look for an overgeneralization or an incorrect legal condition.
- If two choices appear defensible, identify whether the question itself is ambiguous rather than forcing an unsupported conclusion.
8. Frequently Asked Questions
What does Article 21 of the Revised Penal Code establish?
Article 21 establishes that a felony cannot be punished by a penalty that was not prescribed by law before its commission.
What is favorable retroactivity under Article 22?
It is the application of a favorable penal law to an earlier offense when the conditions established by Article 22 are satisfied.
Does a pardon by the offended party automatically terminate a criminal case?
No. Article 23 provides that a pardon by the offended party does not extinguish criminal action except as provided by law, including the applicable provisions of Article 344.
Does marriage always extinguish the criminal liability of all accused?
No. The legal effect depends on the offense, the applicable statutory provision, and the relevant conditions. Article 344 expressly addresses specified participants in the offenses covered by its rule, so the provision must be interpreted carefully rather than applied as a universal rule.
Why is choice A the intended answer?
Its wording suggests a general rule that marriage automatically extinguishes criminal action or penalties for all accused. That is too broad without specifying the offenses and legal conditions involved. The question should be revised for greater precision because Article 344 does extend its rule to specified participants in covered cases.
9. Quick Review Summary
| Provision | Core Principle |
|---|---|
| Article 21 | Legality of penalties |
| Article 22 | Favorable retroactivity of penal laws |
| Article 23 | Effect of pardon by the offended party |
| Article 344 | Specific prosecution rules, including the marriage-related rule within its legal scope |
The most defensible intended answer to the original question is A, with the important qualification that the wording is overly broad and should be interpreted in light of the governing statutory provisions.
10. Prepare for Your CLE with SLRC
Strengthen your Criminologist Licensure Examination preparation by practicing consistently and understanding the rationale behind every answer. Reviewing the legal principle, identifying exceptions, and learning how to interpret question wording can help you approach multiple-choice questions more systematically.
The St. Louis Review Center (SLRC) offers a free online reviewer with the following features:
- FREE Practice Tests
- Unlimited Attempts
- Complete Rationales
- Mobile Friendly
Access the FREE SLRC Online Reviewer
Visit the official SLRC website for more review resources.
SLRC — Board Exams Made Easy.
Educational disclaimer: This article is intended for CLE review and general legal education. Consult current Philippine statutes, applicable amendments, and authoritative jurisprudence when analyzing a specific legal issue.